• The Supreme Court docket on December 13, 2018 asked the Centre and states to keep transparency in appointments of Main Information and facts Commissioner (CIC) and Facts Commissioners (IC).
• It asked the federal government to disclose the process for appointment of
Commissioners, including the names of candidates who used and who were being quick-stated.
• A bench of Justices AK Sikri, S Abdul Nazeer and R Subhash Reddy requested the Centre to set the facts of search committees for CIC and ICs on the web site.
• The Centre instructed the apex courtroom, in reply, that the research committee has shortlisted names for the article of CIC and a closing final decision will be taken quickly. A total of 65 programs have arrive up for the put up CIC and 280 apps have been received for the write-up of four ICs in the Central Information and facts Fee.
• At the time these posts are filled up, notification will be issued for inviting programs for remaining posts of ICs.
Vacancies in the State Info Commissions
• The bench also directed the states to fill up vacancies in the State Information and facts Commissions (SICs) to lessen the pendency of conditions.
• It requested the state govt to file the affidavit indicating the pendency of situations ahead of the Condition Information Commission and give factors why the point out does not have to have far more facts commissioners.
July 2018 ruling of Supreme Courtroom
• The apex court in its July 2018 ruling expressed problem around vacancies at the Central Info Commission and State Information Commissions. It directed the Centre and seven states to file an affidavit giving a time routine for filling up the positions.
• These seven states are Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Gujarat, Kerala, Odisha and Karnataka.
• It also warned that a “strict view” will be taken if Centre or states default in filing the affidavit inside of 4 weeks.
Plea filed by RTI activist Anjali Bhardwaj
• The ruling arrived on a plea submitted by the RTI activists Bhardwaj, Commodore Lokesh Batra (retd) and Amrita Johri, who claimed that above 23500 appeals and grievances are pending with the CIC.
• They also stated the SIC of Andhra Pradesh was “completely non-functional” as not a one information and facts commissioner has been appointed to the panel.
• On the other hand, the West Bengal SIC was working with only two commissioners and was hearing appeals and complaints filed 10 years back.
• The plea stated that numerous facts commissions like that of Gujarat and Maharashtra have been working without the need of the main data commissioner, even though the RTI Act envisages a crucial position for this publish.
Mains Paper 2: Polity
Prelims level: CIC
Mains level: Various Judicial appointments and related issues