[Editorial Analysis] The foreign hand business again: foreign investment in the internet

Mains Paper 3: Economy
Prelims level: Foreign Direct Investment
Mains level: Investment models and associated issues in Indian Economy


• In the past few months, JioMart had expanded to fashion and electronics sales for existing large e-commerce marketplaces. Reliance’s intention to push these segments first for the bigger e-commerce play ahead is obvious. Now there is a dispute among Amazon, Future Retail Ltd and Reliance company.


• Last year, Amazon had bought 49% in one of Future’s unlisted firms, with the right to buy into the listed flagship Future Retail Ltd.

• During the lockdown, the retailers ran into a severe cash crunch.

• In May, Amazon was considering increasing its stake in Future Retail. But no such transaction materialized quickly.

• Future makes a deal with Reliance, infuriating Amazon.

• In early October, amazon accused its partner Future Group of breaching terms of a mutual agreement by announcing an asset sale deal with Reliance.


• The fight is essentially for the dominance of India’s estimated $1 trillion consumer retail market.

• Future Group is caught in the middle of this tussle between these companies.

• Reliance is already the country’s biggest retailer.

• With Acquiring Future’s retail, wholesale, logistics and warehousing units would almost double Reliance’s footprint and give it an unparalleled edge over rivals.


• Legal issues are arising from the dispute such as the validity of emergency arbitral awards, rights of minority shareholders and debt structuring.

• As well as some issues such as FDI in multi-brand retail will turn on the country of incorporation of a party.

• In this current case, there seems to be a risk that the foreign identity of the company might overshadow all relevant legal assessment.


• WhatsApp Pay is still stuck before the Supreme Court even though it claims to have obtained all requisite approvals.

• Multiple petitions have been filed against WhatsApp Pay claiming that permitting foreign entities to launch payment apps would endanger the country’s financial data.

• While National Payments Corporation of India approved the WhatsApp’s data localisation.


• The last few months have also seen a problem by several Indian apps regarding the “gatekeeper” status of foreign app-stores and their ability to arbitrarily remove apps.

• In India, app developers have complained not merely about a competition violation but also a systemic affront to the financial ecosystem of the country.

• The app developers have criticised app-store policies for being “over and above the laws of our country.”

• As well as the founder of Paytm has called Google a “money collecting and money siphoning” machinery.

• There are frequent references to Google as the East India Company, also attempt to monetise the country’s past.

• Sentiments of corporate nationalism become even more noticeable when it comes to Chinese companies.

• Restrictions made by the Indian government is mandating prior approval for Chinese FDI, banning several Chinese apps and restricting Chinese bidders from participating in public procurement contracts.

• Sovereign is well within its rights to increase economic self-reliance.

• To promote domestic businesses, Atmanirbhar Bharat and Make in India campaigns being prime examples of such an exercise of sovereign power.

• The rise in corporate nationalism in India, steeped in ideals of domestic self-reliance.

• As against corporate nationalism foreign investors hold majority stakes in most of these “Indian” startups.

• While painting Amazon as a foreign oppressive ruler, Reliance, also receiving investments from google.


• With this dispute, domestic companies characterise the regulatory landscape in a way which reduces enforcement risk for them. So, foreign companies’ risk being caught in the crossfire due to their “foreign-ness”.

• As well as Indian entities violate laws escape enforcement because of their status as “domestic champions”.

• Such an approach alters legal jurisprudence.

• This approach of altering legal jurisprudence placing the foreign identity of a party at the centre of regulatory
assessments, ultimately subverting the objective of commercial laws.

• These practices also paint a very poor picture for foreign investors and cause uncertainty in an already chaotic legal environment.


Prelims Questions:

Q.1) With respect to “International Day of People with Disabilities (IDPWD)”, consider the following statements:

1. It was proclaimed in 1992 by United Nations General Assembly resolution 47/3.

2. Its objective is to promote the rights and well-being of persons with disabilities in all spheres of society and development and to increase awareness.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
(a) 1 only
(b) 2 only
(c) Both 1 and 2
(d) Neither 1 nor 2
Answer: C

Mains Questions:

Q.1) What do you mean by the FDI? Highlights the instances where the sentiments of corporate nationalism has been raised against foreign corporates? Comment.

Subscribe to Get Weekly updates

Get daily current affair video, detailed current affairs PPT for quick revision and Free One Liner PDF directly in your inbox. Subscribe now to get this month's one liner for FREE.